[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070918213025.GF10199@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:30:25 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:21:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:05:51 -0700
>
> > The bnx2 firmware changes quite frequently. A new driver quite often
> > requires new firmware to work correctly. Splitting them up makes things
> > difficult for the user.
> >
> > The firmware in tg3 is a lot more mature and I don't expect it to
> > change. I think tg3 is better suited for using request_firmware().
>
> Like I said, I think neither should change and the driver should
> be fully functional when built statically into the kernel.
Michael, doesn't a functional-yet-suboptimal firmware exist ? I mean,
just the same principle as we all have kernels, boot CDs, statically
built tools, etc... which run everywhere. If you have such a beast,
maybe it would be a good start to have it in the kernel, and provide
the users with the ability to upgrade the firmware once the system
is able to do more complex things.
Just a thought...
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists