[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F04386.8010209@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:30:46 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify pci_iomap() usage for MMIO-only devices
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The old situation with SATA drivers that had
>
> if (iomem)
> writel(..)
> else
> outl(..)
>
> in the cases that needed it (and used hardcoded writel/outl in the cases
> that didn't) was an example of code that "in theory" is faster. But
> dammit, in practice that mattered not one whit, and what iomap() tries to
> do is to attack the _real_ problem we had in that area.
>
> Which had nothing what-so-ever to do with any branches.
And none of those issues are a factor at all in ath5k (which spawned
this sub-discussion), or indeed many other drivers. The above code you
cite is -generic-, hardware agnostic code.
Most new hardware is MMIO-only, making ioread32() only for drivers that
care about legacy IO support, something that is being slowly phased out.
e.g. legacy IDE, legacy 10/100 mbps ethernet NICs with the dual
MMIO/PIO register spaces.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists