[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p736427vz00.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: 19 Sep 2007 10:30:07 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "David J. Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated)
"David J. Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com> writes:
Not having read the whole thing; just something I noticed.
Gut feeling is that you have too many knobs and options and
some overengineering though -- simplifying it would be a good thing.
> +
> +#define TRACE_PRINTF_TMPBUF_SIZE (1024)
> +static char trace_tmpbuf[NR_CPUS][TRACE_PRINTF_TMPBUF_SIZE];
That definitely needs to be a per CPU variable. Imagine
what happens on a NR_CPUS==4096 kernel. In general when
you have a NR_CPUS indexed array you're likely doing something
wrong. Yes there are still places in the main tree who do that,
but most of them need to be fixed.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists