[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F12ED7.3060605@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:14:47 -0700
From: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated)
Andi Kleen wrote:
> "David J. Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com> writes:
>
> Not having read the whole thing; just something I noticed.
>
> Gut feeling is that you have too many knobs and options and
> some overengineering though -- simplifying it would be a good thing.
>
>> +
>> +#define TRACE_PRINTF_TMPBUF_SIZE (1024)
>> +static char trace_tmpbuf[NR_CPUS][TRACE_PRINTF_TMPBUF_SIZE];
>
> That definitely needs to be a per CPU variable. Imagine
> what happens on a NR_CPUS==4096 kernel. In general when
> you have a NR_CPUS indexed array you're likely doing something
> wrong. Yes there are still places in the main tree who do that,
> but most of them need to be fixed.
I agree with you; however, this is in the example code in the
Documentation directory, It is not part of the trace code. The example
was just meant to be a demonstration of how the interface works.
>
> -Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists