[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A1C0AC9-85CB-43C8-B824-80FD6FA91A2D@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:52:08 +0100
From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries
On 19 Sep 2007, at 18:29, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>> There even is such a function already in mm/
>> sparse.c::vaddr_in_vmalloc_area()
>> with pretty identical content. I would suggest either this new
>> inline should
>> go away completely and use the existing one and export it or the
>> existing one
>> should go away and the inline should be used. It seems silly to
>> have two
>> functions with different names doing exactly the same thing!
>
> Just in case you have not noticed: This patchset removes the
> vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() in sparse.c
That's great! And sorry I did not notice that bit...
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists