| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <39CAD720-C349-4C5C-819B-74BA327B0158@cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:52:46 +0100 From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> Subject: Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries On 19 Sep 2007, at 18:29, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: >> I suspect that is_vmalloc_addr() should not be in linux/mm.h at >> all and should >> be in linux/vmalloc.h instead and vmalloc.h should include linux/ >> highmem.h. >> That would be more sensible than sticking a vmalloc related >> function into >> linux/mm.h where it does not belong... > > Tried it and that leads to all sort of other failures. Ah, a new header file "vaddr.h" or something then? Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists