[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190234836.4318.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:47:16 -0700
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 19:28 +0000, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:26 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:15 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the patch to clean up __GFP_NOFAIL flag in jbd/jbd2. In all
> > > cases except one handles memory allocation failure so I get rid of those
> > > GFP_NOFAIL flags.
> > >
> > > Also, shouldn't we use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_NOFS flag for kmalloc
> > > in jbd/jbd2? I will send a separate patch to cleanup that.
> >
> > No. GFP_NOFS avoids deadlock. It prevents the allocation from making
> > recursive calls back into the file system that could end up blocking on
> > jbd code.
>
> Oh, I see your patch now. You mean use GFP_NOFS instead of
> GFP_KERNEL. :-) OK then.
>
oops, I did mean what you say here.:-)
> > Shaggy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists