[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F1A2C9.4070506@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:29:29 +0200
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@...enic.com>,
CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org>,
john cooper <john.cooper@...rd-harmonic.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
Tim Bird wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>
>> Is anybody working on testing that the patchkit "does no harm" for bigger
>> boxes (laptops, desktops, servers)?
>>
> Not to my knowledge. Most of the things it provides are
> only activated by config options. So my sense is that just
> applying the patches should be harmless. But we'll need some
> runtime testing to see what affect some of these have on
> big iron.
>
Tim is right, Linux-Tiny features are only activated by configuration
options.
However, that doesn't prevent us from proposing size reduction changes
impacting all kernel users, in cases a configuration option doesn't make
sense. Extensive testing in the -mm tree will then be required.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker
http://free-electrons.com
+33 621 604 642
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists