[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070920091042.GA6035@shadowen.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:10:42 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@...enic.com>,
CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org>
Subject: Re: [Celinux-dev] [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> Andrew, you're completely right... The patches should all aim at being
> included into mainline or die.
>
> I'm finishing a sequence of crazy weeks and I will have time to send you
> patches one by one next week, starting with the easiest ones.
Well thats good news. In response to the comments made about testing
the impact of these patches on big-iron I was going to suggest we ask
Andrew to include your patch set in -mm so that it firstly gets at least
compiled on big-iron, and secondly so we could think about how to test
with some of the options enabled on big-iron.
Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would
be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal"
-mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention?
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists