| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:10:42 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> To: Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com> Cc: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@...enic.com>, CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org> Subject: Re: [Celinux-dev] [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > Andrew, you're completely right... The patches should all aim at being > included into mainline or die. > > I'm finishing a sequence of crazy weeks and I will have time to send you > patches one by one next week, starting with the easiest ones. Well thats good news. In response to the comments made about testing the impact of these patches on big-iron I was going to suggest we ask Andrew to include your patch set in -mm so that it firstly gets at least compiled on big-iron, and secondly so we could think about how to test with some of the options enabled on big-iron. Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal" -mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention? -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists