linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070920173036.GA22142@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:30:36 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:25:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Should we do comments for every single function argument, or is it OK to
> leave them out for the obvious ones?

Yes, we should keep the kerneldoc comments coherent, even if it seems
useless in a few cases.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/