linux-kernel - Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070921190738.GB1857@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:07:38 +0400
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-tiny@...enic.com,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: printk proposal - (was Linux-tiny project revival)

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:22:45PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Given that
> > a) there're plenty of printks without any KERN_* bloat,
> > b) there're printks that SHOULD NOT have KERN_* bloat,
> 
> Just to clarify, which bloat are you concerned about?
> I presume source code bloat (but maybe you mean
> message size bloat, or object code bloat)?

Users of ignore_loglevel still has "<[0-7]>" prefixes in kernel image,
yes. On source level, too -- as someone who never saw value in them,
KERN_* are just needless characters, making code harder to read.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/