[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F4182C.9050202@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:14:52 -0400
From: Slava Abramov <slava.abramov@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ptep_test_and_clear_young() i386 vs. x86_64
Hi All!
Is there any special reason why ptep_test_and_clear_young()
implementation for x86_64 does not call pte_update()?
Compare the following:
include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h:
static inline int ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
if (!pte_young(*ptep))
return 0;
return test_and_clear_bit(_PAGE_BIT_ACCESSED, &ptep->pte);
}
include/asm-i386/pgtable.h:
#define ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, ptep) ({ \
int __ret = 0; \
if (pte_young(*(ptep))) \
__ret = test_and_clear_bit(_PAGE_BIT_ACCESSED, \
&(ptep)->pte_low); \
if (__ret) \
pte_update((vma)->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
\
__ret; \
})
Slava
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists