| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:30:17 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Cc: vapier@...too.org, patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__ On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> > > This brings x86_64 into line with all other architectures by only defining > cond_syscall() when __KERNEL__ is defined. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> > Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h > @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ This is the previous __KERNEL__ block. > #endif /* __NO_STUBS */ And this one shouldn't extent iver the declarations of sys_iopl and sys_rt_sigactions I think. If it should be there at all. So please make this file at least semi-clean while you're at it instead of much worse. The __KERNEL__ block should also be extended over the various __ARCH_WANT_ definitions because they're not for userspace at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists