linux-kernel - Re: sys_chroot+sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:21:27 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, majkls <majkls@...pere.com>,
	bunk@...tum.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:04:14 +0930
David Newall <david@...idnewall.com> wrote:

> Al Viro wrote:
> > Oh, for fsck sake...  Folks, it's standard-required behaviour.  Ability
> > to chroot() implies the ability to break out of it.  Could we please
> > add that (along with reference to SuS) to l-k FAQ and be done with that
> > nonsense?
> 
> I'm pretty confident that it's only standard behavior for Linux.  Every 
> other unix says it's not allowed.

Go try them, then come back and admit your error
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/