[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070926122127.74cdd000@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:21:27 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, majkls <majkls@...pere.com>,
bunk@...tum.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:04:14 +0930
David Newall <david@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> > Oh, for fsck sake... Folks, it's standard-required behaviour. Ability
> > to chroot() implies the ability to break out of it. Could we please
> > add that (along with reference to SuS) to l-k FAQ and be done with that
> > nonsense?
>
> I'm pretty confident that it's only standard behavior for Linux. Every
> other unix says it's not allowed.
Go try them, then come back and admit your error
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists