linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] CRED: Split the task security data and move part of it into struct cred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22215.1190813419@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:30:19 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] CRED: Split the task security data and move part of it into struct cred

Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:

> Precisely when to use one identity vs. the other though isn't always
> clear, and the potential for accidental divergence is also a concern.

What should auditing use in audit_filter_rules() when dealing with
AUDIT_SUBJ_* cases?  Should the SUBJ cases use the subjective SID and the
AUDIT_OBJ_* cases use the objective SID?  On the other hand AUDIT_OBJ_* cases
don't seem to have anything to do with tasks.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/