[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190816087.15779.81.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:14:47 -0400
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, viro@....linux.org.uk,
hch@...radead.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] CRED: Split the task security data and move part
of it into struct cred
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:30 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Precisely when to use one identity vs. the other though isn't always
> > clear, and the potential for accidental divergence is also a concern.
>
> What should auditing use in audit_filter_rules() when dealing with
> AUDIT_SUBJ_* cases? Should the SUBJ cases use the subjective SID and the
> AUDIT_OBJ_* cases use the objective SID? On the other hand AUDIT_OBJ_* cases
> don't seem to have anything to do with tasks.
(cc'd linux-audit)
As you say, I don't think AUDIT_OBJ_* has anything to do with tasks,
just object labels (like inode labels).
I think you likely want the actor SID / subject SID or whatever you want
to call it for AUDIT_SUBJ_*.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists