[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070927070118.2bd4792e@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:01:18 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file
without options
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:19 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> The early LFS work that Linux uses favours EFBIG in various places.
> SuSv3 specifically uses EOVERFLOW for this as noted by Michael (Bug
> 7253)
isn't this an ABI change?
What's the gain for doing this ABI change?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists