[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070927151921.29b19abb@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:19:21 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file
without options
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:01:18 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:19 +0100
> Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > The early LFS work that Linux uses favours EFBIG in various places.
> > SuSv3 specifically uses EOVERFLOW for this as noted by Michael (Bug
> > 7253)
> isn't this an ABI change?
Its a change of a specific error return from the wrong error to the right
one, nothing more. Fixing the returned error gives us correct behaviour
according to the standards and other systems.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists