[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070928220446.3f3b839e@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:04:46 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
> And also, I wonder if at a minimum we should be guaranteeing ACPI BIOS calls
> only ever happen from CPU#0 (or the "boot" CPU)? Or do we do that already?
The real question that matters is "does windows" which possibly someone
who touches Windows can definitively answer. For APM we lock to CPU 0 and
have to because its what MS did, not because of the spec.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists