[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191013429.5513.45.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:03:48 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 19:28 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (28/09/07 11:37), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce:
> > Still need to fix 'nodes_intersect' -> 'nodes_intersects'. See below.
> >
<snip>
> > > diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff linux-2.6.23-rc8-mm2-020_zoneid_zonelist/kernel/cpuset.c linux-2.6.23-rc8-mm2-030_filter_nodemask/kernel/cpuset.c
> > > --- linux-2.6.23-rc8-mm2-020_zoneid_zonelist/kernel/cpuset.c 2007-09-28 15:49:39.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc8-mm2-030_filter_nodemask/kernel/cpuset.c 2007-09-28 15:49:57.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -1516,22 +1516,14 @@ nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct ta
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > - * cpuset_zonelist_valid_mems_allowed - check zonelist vs. curremt mems_allowed
> > > - * @zl: the zonelist to be checked
> > > + * cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed - check nodemask vs. curremt mems_allowed
> > > + * @nodemask: the nodemask to be checked
> > > *
> > > - * Are any of the nodes on zonelist zl allowed in current->mems_allowed?
> > > + * Are any of the nodes in the nodemask allowed in current->mems_allowed?
> > > */
> > > -int cpuset_zonelist_valid_mems_allowed(struct zonelist *zl)
> > > +int cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(nodemask_t *nodemask)
> > > {
> > > - int i;
> > > -
> > > - for (i = 0; zl->_zonerefs[i].zone; i++) {
> > > - int nid = zonelist_node_idx(zl->_zonerefs[i]);
> > > -
> > > - if (node_isset(nid, current->mems_allowed))
> > > - return 1;
> > > - }
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return nodes_intersect(nodemask, current->mems_allowed);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -- should be nodes_intersects, I think.
>
> Crap, you're right, I missed the warning about implicit declarations. I
> apologise. This is the corrected version
Mel:
When I'm rebasing a patch series, I use a little script [shell function,
actually] to make just the sources modified by each patch, before moving
on to the next. That way, I have fewer log messages to look at, and
warnings and such jump out so I can fix them while I'm at the patch that
causes them. That's how I caught this one. Here's the script, in case
you're interested:
--------------------------
#qm - quilt make -- attempt to compile all .c's in patch
# Note: some files might not compile if they wouldn't build in
# the current config.
qm()
{
# __in_ktree qm || return
make silentoldconfig; # in case patch changes a Kconfig*
quilt files | \
while read file xxx
do
ftype=${file##*.}
if [[ "$ftype" != "c" ]]
then
# echo "Skipping $file" >&2
continue
fi
f=${file%.*}
echo "make $f.o" >&2
make $f.o
done
}
---------------------------
This is part of a larger set of quilt wrappers that, being basically
lazy, I use to reduce typing. I've commented out one dependency on
other parts of the "environment". To use this, I build an unpatched
kernel before starting the rebase, so that the .config and all of the
pieces are in place for the incremental makes.
Works for me...
Later,
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists