[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190968358.18681.14.camel@chaos>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:32:38 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: roel <12o3l@...cali.nl>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 01:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:17:30 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > can we please add this to checkpatch.pl ?
> >
> > > -spinlock_t bpci_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> > > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bpci_lock);
>
> That check is already in checkpatch. Problem is that hardly anyone
> runs the thing.
Sigh, I forgot that perl is write only. :)
> I think we're ready to wire checkpatch up to a email robot which monitors
> the mailing lists and sends people nastygrams. I bet that'll be popular ;)
We should wire it up to git-commit as well. A lot of that comes in via
git subsystems.
> (I'd love it if it could detect wordwrapped and tab-expanded patches, too.
> You wouldn't _believe_...)
I know ...
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists