[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070929131317.6a8609dc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:13:17 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Printing numbers in parentheses is fine
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:53:06 -0700 David Brownell wrote:
> > From randy.dunlap@...cle.com Sat Sep 29 11:40:17 2007
> >
> > Let's kill it, please. (i.e., ACK)
>
> But ... why? What value could needless parens provide?
Who says that needless parens could provide value?
> "Yet Another Subtle And Hard To Fix Source Of Bloat" is
> not a plus.
ISTM that we agree.
> I'd kind of think a change like this should have some
> positive motivation.
"Me, I agree that numbers in parens don't usually make sense for
kernel messages."
It's too trivial to be included in CodingStyle.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists