[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070930173340.GA13066@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:33:40 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>, cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> Add a new per-cpuset flag called 'sched_load_balance'.
>
> When enabled in a cpuset (the default value) it tells the kernel
> scheduler that the scheduler should provide the normal load balancing
> on the CPUs in that cpuset, sometimes moving tasks from one CPU to a
> second CPU if the second CPU is less loaded and if that task is
> allowed to run there.
>
> When disabled (write "0" to the file) then it tells the kernel
> scheduler that load balancing is not required for the CPUs in that
> cpuset.
i like this, this feature would be quite useful for -rt and CPU
shielding.
( a cpuset is a mandatory container for set_cpus_allowed(), so there is
a material and app-visible difference between a 4-CPU cpuset that has
balancing disabled and 4x 1-CPU cpusets. )
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists