linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:33:40 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>, cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag


* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:

> Add a new per-cpuset flag called 'sched_load_balance'.
> 
> When enabled in a cpuset (the default value) it tells the kernel 
> scheduler that the scheduler should provide the normal load balancing 
> on the CPUs in that cpuset, sometimes moving tasks from one CPU to a 
> second CPU if the second CPU is less loaded and if that task is 
> allowed to run there.
> 
> When disabled (write "0" to the file) then it tells the kernel 
> scheduler that load balancing is not required for the CPUs in that 
> cpuset.

i like this, this feature would be quite useful for -rt and CPU 
shielding.

( a cpuset is a mandatory container for set_cpus_allowed(), so there is
  a material and app-visible difference between a 4-CPU cpuset that has 
  balancing disabled and 4x 1-CPU cpusets. )

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/