linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ehea: DLPAR memory add fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47010CC4.7000204@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:05:40 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehea: DLPAR memory add fix

Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Monday 01 October 2007 16:44, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
>>> Due to stability issues in high load situations the HW queue handling
>>> has to be changed. The HW queues are now stopped and restarted again instead
>>> of destroying and allocating new HW queues. 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>
>> May I presume this is for 2.6.23?
>>
>> 	Jeff
> 
> no, the patch is build against 2.6.24 upstream (new NAPI interface).

OK, thanks.

Since we typically have two streams, the current bug-fix stream and the 
for-next-kernel stream, please indicate to which kernel/git tree your 
patch applies, in the future.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/