| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0710010803280.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:07:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, casey@...aufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, James Morris wrote: > > Merging Smack, however, would lock the kernel into the LSM API. > Presently, as SELinux is the only in-tree user, LSM can still be removed. Hell f*cking NO! You security people are insane. I'm tired of this "only my version is correct" crap. The whole and only point of LSM was to get away from that. And anybody who claims that there is "consensus" on SELinux is just in denial. People are arguing against other peoples security on totally bogus points. First it was AppArmor, now this. I guess I have to merge AppArmor and SMACK just to get this *disease* off the table. You're acting like a string theorist, claiming that t here is no other viable theory out there. Stop it. It's been going on for too damn long. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists