[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191321861.13204.53.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:44:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 12:31 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> What would be the point in another top-level tree for device
> information? All devices you are exporting information for, are
> already in the sysfs tree, right?
Never did find NFS mounts/servers/superblocks or whatever constitutes a
BDI for NFS in there. Same goes for all other networked filesystems for
that matter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists