[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071002104734.GA9410@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:47:34 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:44:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 12:31 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> > What would be the point in another top-level tree for device
> > information? All devices you are exporting information for, are
> > already in the sysfs tree, right?
>
> Never did find NFS mounts/servers/superblocks or whatever constitutes a
> BDI for NFS in there. Same goes for all other networked filesystems for
> that matter.
And loop/md/dm devices...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists