| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071002051852.GC28345@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:18:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] printk: add KERN_CONT annotation
* Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> Well, I think that we could do something like this :
>
> #define KERN_CONT ""
> ...
> printk(KERN_ERR "foo");
> <100 lines of whatever>
> printk(KERN_CONT "bar\n");
>
> It would indicate the author's *intent* which is to continue a line
> which has already been started. It would both permit us to remove
> false positives from automated scripts, and to read the code more
> easily. And this is not a big constaint for the author, given that
> such constructs are quite rare.
ah, this is even nicer than the raw_printk() thing i suggested, and it
also nicely documents the intention of the author. Patch attached below.
And i'd like to stress the principle that is followed here: in this
particular case the checkpatch.pl warning is very useful, but still
there are false positives. Fortunately they are so rare that it's worth
annotating those few exceptions in the source. Note that the goal is
still to be able to achieve 100% warning-free source code. _That_ should
be the driving principle behind checkpatch.pl warnings.
Ingo
------------------>
Subject: printk: add KERN_CONT annotation
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
printk: add the KERN_CONT annotation (which is empty string but via
which checkpatch.pl can notice that the lacking KERN_ level is fine).
This useful for multiple calls of hand-crafted printk output done by
early debug code or similar.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/sched.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux/include/linux/kernel.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ linux/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[];
#define KERN_INFO "<6>" /* informational */
#define KERN_DEBUG "<7>" /* debug-level messages */
+/*
+ * Annotation for a "continued" line of log printout (only done after a
+ * line that had no enclosing \n). Only to be used by core/arch code
+ * during early bootup (a continued line is not SMP-safe otherwise).
+ */
+#define KERN_CONT ""
+
extern int console_printk[];
#define console_loglevel (console_printk[0])
Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4770,18 +4770,18 @@ static void show_task(struct task_struct
unsigned state;
state = p->state ? __ffs(p->state) + 1 : 0;
- printk("%-13.13s %c", p->comm,
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%-13.13s %c", p->comm,
state < sizeof(stat_nam) - 1 ? stat_nam[state] : '?');
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
- printk(" running ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " running ");
else
- printk(" %08lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
+ printk(KERN_CONT " %08lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
#else
if (state == TASK_RUNNING)
- printk(" running task ");
+ printk(KERN_CONT " running task ");
else
- printk(" %016lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
+ printk(KERN_CONT " %016lx ", thread_saved_pc(p));
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE
{
@@ -4791,7 +4791,7 @@ static void show_task(struct task_struct
free = (unsigned long)n - (unsigned long)end_of_stack(p);
}
#endif
- printk("%5lu %5d %6d\n", free, p->pid, p->parent->pid);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%5lu %5d %6d\n", free, p->pid, p->parent->pid);
if (state != TASK_RUNNING)
show_stack(p, NULL);
@@ -5527,20 +5527,20 @@ static void sched_domain_debug(struct sc
}
if (!group->__cpu_power) {
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: domain->cpu_power not "
"set\n");
break;
}
if (!cpus_weight(group->cpumask)) {
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: empty group\n");
break;
}
if (cpus_intersects(groupmask, group->cpumask)) {
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: repeated CPUs\n");
break;
}
@@ -5548,11 +5548,11 @@ static void sched_domain_debug(struct sc
cpus_or(groupmask, groupmask, group->cpumask);
cpumask_scnprintf(str, NR_CPUS, group->cpumask);
- printk(" %s", str);
+ printk(KERN_CONT " %s", str);
group = group->next;
} while (group != sd->groups);
- printk("\n");
+ printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
if (!cpus_equal(sd->span, groupmask))
printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: groups don't span "
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists