[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071002100441.GB5361@lazybastard.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:04:42 +0200
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] printk: add KERN_CONT annotation
On Tue, 2 October 2007 07:18:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ah, this is even nicer than the raw_printk() thing i suggested, and it
> also nicely documents the intention of the author. Patch attached below.
KERN_CONT was brought up in the linux-tiny discussion. Not sure if you
want to get involved in that, but there may be value in adding one
variant of KERN_CONT per debug level:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/30/151
> And i'd like to stress the principle that is followed here: in this
> particular case the checkpatch.pl warning is very useful, but still
> there are false positives. Fortunately they are so rare that it's worth
> annotating those few exceptions in the source. Note that the goal is
> still to be able to achieve 100% warning-free source code. _That_ should
> be the driving principle behind checkpatch.pl warnings.
Thank you for working on this. I had nearly given up on checkpatch
before.
Jörn
--
When people work hard for you for a pat on the back, you've got
to give them that pat.
-- Robert Heinlein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists