[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071003093517.GA22558@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:35:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com,
cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets
* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> There might be an even simpler way. If the kernel/sched.c routines
> detach_destroy_domains() and build_sched_domains() were exposed as
> external routines, then the cpuset code could call them directly,
> removing the partition_sched_domains() routine from sched.c entirely.
> Would this be worth persuing?
in any case i'd like to see the externally visible API get in foremost -
and there now seems to be agreement about that. (yay!) Any internal
shaping of APIs can be done flexibly between cpusets and the scheduler.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists