linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:39:24 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com,
	cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix sched-domains partitioning by cpusets

> in any case i'd like to see the externally visible API get in foremost - 
> and there now seems to be agreement about that. (yay!) Any internal 
> shaping of APIs can be done flexibly between cpusets and the scheduler.

Yup - though Nick and I will have to agree to -some- internal interface
between the cpuset and sched code, at least for the moment.

At least, if we thrash about on this, we won't be changing the externally
visible API around.  We'll just continue driving Andrew nuts, not our
users - that's an improvement.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/