[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071002210125.85b84add.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:01:25 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: ak@...e.de, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:30:31 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
> >> would save others the trouble.
> >>
> >> Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick scan of the code, so it
> >> certainly needs a sanity review before going upstream.
> >
> > "iommu" is listed in Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt
> > along with more x86_64-specific boot options.
> > A few other arches do something similar...
>
> Ah! Well, seeing as how we already have a provision for arch-specific
> options in kernel-parameters.txt, and some less-obscure arch-specific
> options can be found there, I think an argument can be made for my patch :)
>
> Nonethless, if the maintainer disagrees, they can drop this patch I suppose.
[sorry if there be duplicates; I thought I sent this but can't find it
anywhere]
Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists