[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071003041510.GJ5724@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:45:10 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:59:04PM +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> The following patch (sched: disable sleeper_fairness on SCHED_BATCH)
> seems to break GROUP_SCHED. Although, it may be
> 'oops'-less due to the possibility of 'p' being always a valid
> address.
Thanks for catching it! Patch below looks good to me.
Acked-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 8727d17..a379456 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -473,9 +473,8 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
> vruntime += sched_vslice_add(cfs_rq, se);
>
> if (!initial) {
> - struct task_struct *p = container_of(se, struct task_struct, se);
> -
> - if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS) && p->policy != SCHED_BATCH)
> + if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS) && entity_is_task(se) &&
> + task_of(se)->policy != SCHED_BATCH)
> vruntime -= sysctl_sched_latency;
>
> vruntime = max_t(s64, vruntime, se->vruntime);
>
> ---
>
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists