[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m18x6d1g08.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:57:27 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> writes:
> --- "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> It really seems to me that the LSM as currently structured creates
>> a large barrier to entry for people who have just this little thing
>> they want to do that is not possible with any existing security
>> module.
>
> I honestly think that the barrier has been more political
> in nature than technical. I don't know how long you've been
> watching, but no attempt to get an LSM upstream has escaped
> exagerated cricism from certain factions. Only someone who wants
> to get cut to metaphorical ribbons would submit a little LSM.
> Maybe that will get better now. I sure hope so.
Yes. Me to. I certainly agree about the political part.
My only hope was to suggest something that my reduce what there is to
get political about.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists