linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: remove dead code in pgtable_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:46:14 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386:  remove dead code in pgtable_cache_init

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I believe that virtualization support needed a full pgd.
>   

Yes, Xen requires it for PAE pgds, at least at the moment.  But native,
lguest, vmi and kvm don't.  I'd made it so that the memory overhead was
only paid in the Xen case.  Allocating a whole page all the time
certainly simplifies things, but at the cost of more overhead for everyone.

If we move away from using the page->private field to link the pgds
together, then I can probably remove Xen's need to allocate a whole page
for PAE pgds.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/