lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <470D4826.2060903@goop.org> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:46:14 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: remove dead code in pgtable_cache_init Christoph Lameter wrote: > I believe that virtualization support needed a full pgd. > Yes, Xen requires it for PAE pgds, at least at the moment. But native, lguest, vmi and kvm don't. I'd made it so that the memory overhead was only paid in the Xen case. Allocating a whole page all the time certainly simplifies things, but at the cost of more overhead for everyone. If we move away from using the page->private field to link the pgds together, then I can probably remove Xen's need to allocate a whole page for PAE pgds. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists