lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200710101531.26944.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:31:26 +1000 From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> To: Berkley Shands <berkley@....wustl.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23 spinlock hang in kswapd under heavy disk write loads On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:33, Berkley Shands wrote: > 2.6.23 with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK on does not hang under very high write > loads to either an LSI8888ELP (write rate 1.1GB/Sec) or to a highpoint > RR2340 (write rate 1.0GB/Sec). With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK off however, the > system hangs with kswapd getting 100% of the cpu and most if not all other > processes are locked out. Sometimes even the keyboard is locked out. > > This is seen on a supermicro H8DM3-2 and H8DMi-2 motherboards, 16 GB RAM, > 2222 SE or 2216 processors. Not seen on a Uniwide 3546ES, or on a > Supermicro H8DM8 with 8222 CPUS. > > kswapd sits at (according to KDB) > __spinlock_irqsave + 0x15 > prepare_to_wait + 0x15 > kswapd + 0xe3 > kthread + 0x47 This is the pgdat->kswapd_wait waitqueue lock, by the looks? It should be basically impossible to get this lock wrong, so perhaps what happens is some memory corruption which is padded (or some other random change) by spinlock debugging? Is this very reproducable? Does your dmesg have any funny messages after performing this heavy write load with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK set? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists