linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4710CF9F.6080207@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:01:03 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Oct 13 2007 10:16, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Perhaps say
>>
>> 	warning("override: switching to choice %s", sym->name);
>>
>> if sym->name is [CONFIG_]PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.  Or what is it?
> 
> .config:176:warning: override: reassigning to symbol PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
> .config:176:warning: override: PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY turns state choice

Try to make it a single warning.

> Which seems correct, as PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y will overturn
> the previous decision.
> 
> Perhaps it should be "%s overturns state choice" ?

Sounds like "overthrows government".
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/