linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710131609170.3348@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:15:16 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, zippel@...ux-m68k.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides


On Oct 13 2007 16:01, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> 
>> .config:176:warning: override: reassigning to symbol PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
>> .config:176:warning: override: PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY turns state choice
>
>Try to make it a single warning.

Patches welcome. Even without the patch, i.e. original kconfig
behavior, spews two warnings. One for the symbol, and one for the choiec
object. I do not see anything wrong with that; adding extra checks
would perhaps only increase the code size.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/