[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071015142546.GA7851@tango.0pointer.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:25:46 +0200
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: SCHED_FIFO watchdog timer
On Sun, 14.10.07 00:51, Peter Zijlstra (a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl) wrote:
> The below patch is an idea proposed by tglx and depends on sched-devel +
> the hrtick patch previously posted.
>
> The current watchdog action is to demote the task to SCHED_NORMAL,
> however it might be wanted to deliver a signal instead (or have more per
> task configuration state). Which is why I added Lennart to the CC list
> as I gathered he would like something like this for PulseAudio.
Indeed! Having this in the kernel would allow us to enable RT
scheduling for PulseAudio by default without bad effects. I was thinking about
adding some kind of babysitting process to userspace -- but doing this as
an RLIMIT in the kernel strikes me a much better idea!
I think it would make a lot of sense to make the API very similar to
RLIMIT_CPU, i.e. also send out SIGXCPU and SIGKILL, with the single
difference that RLIMIT_CPU sends out a signal depending on the total
CPU time used for the process and the new RLIMIT based on the time the
process spent without sleeping. That would be a very reasonable
extension to the current RLIMIT_CPU model.
Thank you very much for doing this patch!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists