[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071015192703.GA7279@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:27:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] scsi: fix crash in gdth_timeout()
* Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> > Honestly, the driver is probably rarely run by people that lack the
> > hardware, I bet...
>
> It was all "flight by instruments only". I called for HW testers and
> none came forward. All these changes, apart from "successful downgrade
> to messy" where also needed in order to push important changes to
> scsi.
>
> But a little bird said that QEMU might simulate this HW. SO I guess it
> is QEMU time for me.
heh. Incidentally i was thinking about using KVM for automated testing.
Important pieces of hardware should get an in-KVM simulator/emulator,
that way developers who do not own that hardware can do functionality
testing too. So basically the highest-quality drivers would have an
"inverse driver" in KVM, which simulates the hardware. (that model is
evidently useful to the hardware maker even for new hardware: it can
then also be used to test the Linux compatibility and Linux performance
of future planned releases of the hardware, etc.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists