[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071016074943.GA24481@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:49:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] forcedeth: fix the NAPI poll function
* Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> >FYI, looks good so far, ontop of Linus' latest -git tree.
> >
> >btw., one thing i always found weird about forcedeth is that it
> >generates an extra ~100 irqs per second even when there's no network
> >traffic:
> >
> > 11: 89752 XT-PIC-XT eth0
> > 11: 89854 XT-PIC-XT eth0
> > 11: 89955 XT-PIC-XT eth0
> > 11: 90056 XT-PIC-XT eth0
> > 11: 90157 XT-PIC-XT eth0
> >
> >(irq count snapshot every second). Just in case it's easy to fix ...
>
>
> May I presume that behavior occurs in both mainline and my fe-lock
> branch?
correct.
> That is likely the NIC's timer irq, which is programmed to kick the
> irq handler every so often. DEV_NEED_TIMERIRQ is a starting point, as
> well as "Known bugs" at the top of forcedeth.c, if you're curious.
>
> I'm _betting_ that some of that can be eliminated, but we'll see...
ok. Was just a FYI - you were looking for feedback :-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists