linux-kernel - Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:11:38 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage

On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
> I am trying to think out loud as to what the root cause of the problem
> might be. In one of the discussion threads, I saw utime going backwards,
> which seemed very odd, I suspect that those are rounding errors.

I only remembered stime going backwards, but looking back at the mails
you are right, there has been one case of utime going backwards too.
stime going backwards happens _much_ more frequently.

> I have tried and not had any success reproducing the problem, could you
> please help me with some pointers/steps to reproduce the problem?

I can reproduce the problem reliably for two KDE programs I have running
permanently on my system: kontact and amarok. Both of these wake up
regularly and use some (not very much) processor capacity before going to
sleep again. Any process that has that that characteristic should do.

/me thinks a bit and tries something

lol - I have just managed to reproduce this with 'top' itself :-P

Run 'top' in one terminal; then in another terminal:
$ ps ax | grep " [t]op"
17869 pts/0    S+     0:00 top
$ while true; do awk '{print $14" "$15}' /proc/17869/stat; sleep 1; done | ts
[...]
Oct 16 11:54:48 8 10
Oct 16 11:54:49 6 12  <-- utime
Oct 16 11:54:50 6 12
Oct 16 11:54:51 6 12
Oct 16 11:54:52 8 10  <-- stime
Oct 16 11:54:53 8 10
Oct 16 11:54:54 8 10
Oct 16 11:54:55 8 12
Oct 16 11:54:56 8 12

This example happens to have both stime _and_ utime decreasing...

'ts' is a small utility that prints the timestamps before the readings;
the test will work just as well without it.
Note that it may take a while for the error to show up. In this case it
was 40 seconds.

Cheers,
Frans Pop
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/