linux-kernel - Re: halt does not shut the system down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4715C337.6050705@free.fr>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:09:27 +0200
From:	John Sigler <linux.kernel@...e.fr>
To:	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
CC:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	robert.moore@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: halt does not shut the system down

Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:

> John Sigler wrote:
> 
>>          +===================================+
>>          | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN              |
>>          |-----------------------------------|
>>          | Instant-Off  ..... [v]            |
>>          | Delay 4 Sec. ..... [ ]            |
>>          |                                   |
>>          |-----------------------------------|
>>          |  ^V:Move ENTER:Accept ESC:Abort   |
>>          +===================================+
>>
>> 'Instant-Off' is the appropriate setting, right?
>
> Actually, default should be 4 sec delay. OS should have 
> a chance to shut down the system...

I don't see why this setting would have an impact on the outcome
of the 'halt' and 'poweroff' commands.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/