[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071017182206.GS15552@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:22:07 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bug] block subsystem related crash with latest -git
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > So avoiding the "sg_next()" on the last entry is pointless.
> >
> > Yeah, I didn't quite understand why if sg was valid, why dereferencing
> > *(sg + 1)->page would crap out :/
>
> Actually, I take that back. If 'sg' is the last entry in a *non*linked
> scatter-gather list (ie we don't use the last entry as a link, we actually
> use it as a real SG entry), then "sg_next(sg)" will indeed access past the
> end of the whole allocated array, and will access one past the end.
>
> And with page-alloc debugging, that *will* blow up.
>
> So I think your change to use "sg_next()" only when you actually need a
> next pointer is the correct one after all.
Thanks, so I'm not totally crazy :-)
Can you just pull:
git://git.kernel.dk/data/git/linux-2.6-block.git for-linus
then so we get those two pieces correct? Then the remaining issue seems
to be a new one that is biting Ingo elsewhere, at least we'll all be on
the same page then.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists