linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix adbhid mismerge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:28:34 +0200
From:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix adbhid mismerge

On 2007.10.17 18:18:21 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.10.16 19:21:53 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > 
> > > I don't think you did anything wrong. You used both --full-history 
> > > (implicitly: git-whatchanged) and you made sure to see the diffs for both 
> > > sides of any merge (-m), and that means that you should see every single 
> > > diff involved.
> > 
> > Btw, if anybody can come up with a better way to find these kinds of 
> > mis-merges, I'd love to hear about it.
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > What I'd actually really like would be something that shows the original 
> > conflict, but that's really expensive to compute (it basically involves 
> > re-doing the merge from scratch - finding the proper base commit(s) etc). 
> > So we never did that.
> 
> So here's what I came up with:
> 
> git grep -l "int keycode, up_flag" \
> 	$(git-rev-list HEAD --parents -- drivers/macintosh/adbhid.c | \
> 		egrep '(.{40} ?){3}' | cut -d' ' -f1) \
> 	-- drivers/macintosh/adbhid.c | grep -o '^[^:]*'
> 
> Which gives: b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd
> 
> Then:
> git checkout b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd^1
> git merge b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd^2
> 
> And you got your merge conflict.
> 
> The idea is, that the above ugliness searches for the last commit that

Oops!
Obviously I meant to do s/last commit/merge commit/ before sending that
email.

> produced the bad line. The inner git-rev-list call searches for merge
> commits (thanks to Ilari in #git for the egrep trick), then git-grep
> looks which of these have the "bad line" and the final grep just filters
> the filename out.
> 
> If the bash thing spits out more than one commit hash, you probably want
> to use the last one... I guess... And if the given result doesn't
> produce the request merge conflict, well, I guess you could replace HEAD
> in the git-rev-list call with the sha1 you got in the first run, but I'm
> not entirely sure about that.
> 
> Is that helpful?
> 
> Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/