linux-kernel - [RESEND] file operations: release can race with read/write?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adaodexh9uz.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:30:44 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND] file operations: release can race with read/write?

[Resending, directly to a couple likely suspects this time, in the
hope of getting a reply... thanks]

I have a question about the synchronization of file_operations: is it
intended that the .release method of a file can be called while a
.read or .write method is still running for that file?

The reason I ask is that I've seen a crash in practice that appears to
be caused by this race, and I'm wondering whether the correct fix is
to add synchronization between .read/.write and .release to the
driver's methods (this is a character device), or whether the core
kernel is supposed to provide this synchronization.

I've written a quick test case that seems to show this happen in
practice, and reading the code in fs/open.c and fs/read_write.c I see
no reason why this race can't happen: sys_read() and sys_write() just
do fget_light(), which will not increment the file's reference count
on the fast path, so a racing sys_close() from another thread could do
the final fput() that ends up calling the file's .release method
before the read or write has finished.

I think the actual file data structure is OK, because it is freed with
RCU, so it won't be freed too soon.  But a .release method may free
other driver-internal state that is still in use because of this race.

It seems that we wouldn't want to give up the fget_light()
optimization in read/write, so probably the right place to handle this
is in the driver.  But on the other hand, this is kind of a subtle
booby trap that has been laid, and maybe there is a clever way to
handle this.  So I would appreciate guidance from smarter people.

Thanks,
  Roland

BTW, here's the test case -- it seems pretty conclusive to me, but
maybe I'm all wet and misunderstanding things.  There's a kernel
module that just prints "Write raced with close?" if it sees the race,
and a userspace driver that just spawns two threads, one that does
open/close in a loop and one that does write in a loop.  Running this
on my machine, I see several race messages get printed.

--- kernel module ---

#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>

MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

static unsigned long flag;

static int cw_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
	return 0;
}

static int cw_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
	clear_bit(1, &flag);

	msleep(1);

	if (test_and_set_bit(1, &flag))
		printk(KERN_ERR "Write raced with close?\n");

	return 0;
}

static ssize_t cw_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
			size_t len, loff_t *pos)
{
	set_bit(1, &flag);

	return 0;
}

static const struct file_operations cw_fops = {
	.owner	 = THIS_MODULE,
	.open	 = cw_open,
	.release = cw_close,
	.write	 = cw_write,
};

static struct miscdevice cw_misc = {
	.minor	= MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
	.name	= "cw",
	.fops	= &cw_fops,
};

static int __init cw_init(void)
{
	return misc_register(&cw_misc);
}

static void __exit cw_cleanup(void)
{
	misc_deregister(&cw_misc);
}

module_init(cw_init);
module_exit(cw_cleanup);

--- userspace code ---

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pthread.h>

static int dfd = -1;

static void *write_loop(void *p)
{
	char buf[1];

	while (1)
		write(dfd, buf, 1);

	return NULL;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	pthread_t thr;

	if (pthread_create(&thr, NULL, write_loop, NULL))
		return 1;

	while (1) {
		dfd = open("/dev/cw", O_RDWR);
		close(dfd);
	}

	return 0;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/