| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m34pgpmszu.fsf@maximus.localdomain> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:38:29 +0200 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> Cc: linux1394-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version? Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> writes: > And in case of VT6307, I suspect it's VIA who > selects the implementation level (based on chip revision), not the card > vendor. Can't be, the customers (real ones - board makers) would kill them at once and then buy a different brand. That's not selling a different wifi card under the old name. Anyway, I just connected a programmer to the EEPROM (machine "a" in my previous mail = EPIA-M 600 MHz), wrote "8" to the 16-bit word at address 0x11 (93c46 EEPROM), and now this VT6307S dated 0239CD (2002, 39th week) says: ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.1 (PCI): IRQ=[12] MMIO=[de000000-de0007ff] Max Packet=[2048] IR/IT contexts=[4/8] Unfortunately it's not much good for general consumption, and I haven't yet found a way to write to the EEPROM using VT6307 registers (one can easily read it using documented GUID register). Nobody with a good VIA contact? I'm not asking for something extraordinary, am I? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists