linux-kernel - Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <471527E5.1050407@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:06:45 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC:	linux1394-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Both VT6306 and VT6307 datasheets claim selectable OHCI 1.0/1.1.
> I guess they did that for compatibility or something like that.

I wouldn't read too much into these data sheets.  Note that actual OHCI
1.1 features are nowhere documented in these data sheets; i.e. this
documentation can't be trusted to begin with.

As far as VT6306 is concerned, the wording could be copy'n'waste from
the VT6307 datasheet.  And in case of VT6307, I suspect it's VIA who
selects the implementation level (based on chip revision), not the card
vendor.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/