[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071018101739.GS5063@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:17:39 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Of course, this doesn't explain why ata_sg_is_last() was broken, but
> > > > since it's working _and_ slightly more efficient, I don't really
> > > > care :)
> > >
> > > Tomo and I agreed to kill sg_last() a few days ago anyways, so this is
> > > perfectly fine with me.
> >
> > it would still be nice to figure out exactly why it was broken.
>
> It would always be nice. For this case I don't think it's very
> interesting, if we pursue the improved sg iteration setup.
BTW, I think it's pretty clear that ata_sg_is_last() is broken. It's
likely a one-off in the n_iter test.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists