linux-kernel - Re: is the inode an orphan?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:01:52 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is the inode an orphan?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:49:34PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I need a help from VFS folks: when I'm in ->unlink() in is there a safe way 
> to to realize that ->delete_inod()e is going to be called? IOW, I'd like to 
> call myfs_delete_inode() myself form ->unlink(), and not wait for VFS 
> calling ->delete_inode().
> 
> Or to put it differently, I'd like to know if the inode is an orphan or not 
> in ->unlink()?
> 
> AFAICS, if (inode->i_nlink == 0 && atomic_read(&inode->i_count) == 2) then 
> this file is not going to be an orphan. And AFAIC judge, it is safe to use 
>  this, but I'm not sure and kindly ask for help.

Define orphan.  It might very well be still opened after the only link
to it had been removed and you still will get IO on it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/